Everything & Nothing

     I told a guy one day, "If you can’t even imagine Utopia, then you ought not call yourself a human being."

      Still the people of Star Trek even had wars with aliens they ran into.

      Not even Rodenberry could make a show that would keep peoples interest with out conflicts.

      By the time of Greece there was at least an ideal exemplified by the Olympic Games.

      Good to hear of the conflicts over Cricket with Pakistan.   The role of the Umpire, or Referee, or whatever it is they call the officiating official who calls the Game Penalties or enforces it rules in the conflict is a corrillary to the role we expect from the UN, but do not get.

      The problem with the Irag War from the get go was that it was not supported by allies.   It was not a group effort.

      This is not a World War II world that the British and the Americans can rescue.

      Of course without Russia as an ally at the time, this would be a very different world.

      Now the Russian Oligarchs, and the American Oligarchs and the rest of the Oligarchs and Kelptocracies laugh at the nationalists that die for their profit living with all sorts of superstitious beliefs.

      At anyrate the recent little war in Lebanon makes clear again that the world needs a tougher referee that its got for its wars.

      If Islamist, and Christians and Buddist and Mormons, and Hindus and Confusians and Transcendians can accept easily and readily that there are rules to the game, and the Umpire has the last word on the sports fields, in the games they so much care for, why can’t we expect that there be a day when it is the same for our wars?

      Hell, they throw bad balls and bad bats and drug users and gamblers out of the games.

      Why not throw Atom Bombs and Chemical Weapons out of the game?

      I admit it would be about impossible to throw nations out of the game of war, but if us working classes can get together and throw weapons that destroy more jobs than they make, or allow for, it will be a good thing for even the guys at the top, for even their fortunes will not save them from what is sure to come if the rules of the game are not, both changed to be more fair, and then pro-actively enforced.

      The wonderful thing is that there have been periods and times and on battlefields that are more horrible than sport ought to be, when there was sportsmanlike behavior.

      I am impressed that the Japanese eliminated fire arms for 200 years.

      The only reason I have one is that so many people around me do.   I never got one till I was in my 40s since around that time I recognized that I could neither fist fight as well as I was able when I was younger, or run away as fast.

      The bad thing about Nuclear Weapons is that you can’t get out of your own way with them.

      Iran throwing a Nuclear Bomb at Israel is like a man throwing one at the guy across the street, especially if they get some thrown at them afterwards.

      Far as I can tell, the majority of people in the world, whatever their wierd beliefs simply want to go to work and get paid and come home and go to work, and come home and get a few days off to recover from The Grind.

      Being a soldier is a grind, but it’s still a job.   As a carpenter I do love my nail gun, and I would like a better nail gun.   In fact I would like to have the best nail gun ever made or possible to make.

      If I was a soldier I would want the very best gun.

      But I think even great soldiers, and honorable warriors in majority don’t want weapons that they wouldn’t want used on them fairly.

      Of course any soldier knows that he is likely to use any weapon he’s got if it will buy him another second on Earth in the heat of the fight.

      Certainly I would want my Transcendian Warriors to have the very best weapons for offense and defense.

      Would they love me, and fight for me if I took away Nuclear Weapons?

      The only thing that would really get North Korea, and Iran and Pakistan and Israel to give up Nuclear Weapons would be if the UN, got every other Nation like the US Russia and China and France and England to give them up.

      Fair is Fair, there is no other resolution.

      The Working Classes do need to find voice and lead the whole world in unity across national boundraries and at least get Weapons of Mass Destruction out of their hair.

       Chernoble and Three Mile Island sorts of events will be enough trouble.

       Not to mention Alien Steered Asteroids like the one the Wrathful God of Big Rocks is sending our way.

                                                                    Love, Russell

P.S   I have never been able to find the spell check for this program.   It will be edited for that after my wife gets home.

We’re Members of The World/Working Class Corner

      Dick Gephardt made a speech about the need for an International Minimum Wage, and it is not surprising that it got little coverage and I never knew of it till after I had come to the same conclusion.

      The failure of the entire government of the US of late rests on the failure of both the Democrats and the Repulicans to fully grasp realities of power in the hands of others in the world.

      For the working classes the corporations might as well be terrorists as far as the grind.

      Still, you can’t blame employers who have to compete internationally for doing what they have to do to survive.

      Linclon felt that a nation ought to be completely self sustaining and not need commerce with any other nation.   I agree with him that this is the strongest position from which to work, but there is a delight in successful trading with others unlike yourself.

      Far as I can tell those who are considered most sucessful in the US are getting rich from selling out their employees.   Any job that can be sold to China or India is being sold to China or India, or any other nation.

      It really is no small thing that China and Russia trample on intellectual property rights.

      The creative class are as much gamblers as gamblers, but they are destroyed by thieves.   My own fortunes have suffered because of intellectual property thieft in Russia.

      The need of an international minimum wage is simply one point in a number that need to be addressed by the US, through a UN that has teeth, and most frighteningly will need to be regarded by all, in the same way States of the US regard its Federal Government.

      I was born into submission to the United States, and others are born into submission to their homeland, the place they were born and were then automatically a citizen of.

       Maybe all workers would be right to have the right to dual citizenship.   I work with Mexicans all the time.   For me it is really about competing with the young.   My body is wearing out, and on top of it at the same time my nation is selling me out.

       Ever since Viet Nam the story of the United States for people like me, the working class, has been one of failed morality and wasted courage.

       It is immoral to do unethical things more than it is ethical to do all that is called moral.

       – This is why I am not for the Theocracies with which I am familar, and want the Democratic Party, to come up with a real plan as concerns foreign policy, since it really is getting awfully local as far as the effects on me and people like me.

       That policy can only be practical if it is based on working class realities shared by the people in all nations that are competing for the same jobs.

       The right to your religion or what someone else will regard as superstition is best enjoyed for its culture, if you get a fair paycheck to take home to your wife or wives or otherwise temporary or permanent partner.

      Money Ideology Compromise and Ego are the things that really motivate us.   This is the modern world so there is money involved.   As messed up as the world is, there is work enough for everyone cleaning it up, and it ought to pay fairly.

       We are smart enough to combine the Natural Resource Mining and the Service Economies internationally so as to make it clear to all who the mad dogs are.

       But even smart people need to hire people with guns and the stomach to use them, and us so called liberals need to face that fact, and then put in place laws that are bald and on the face of them clearly fair as far as the interests of making work, valued, and safe.

       This is why if I have a limited armed force in Iraq, or any other area of conflict I would have that force protect the infrastructure workers first.   When an International Peace Keeping force works without mandate, as may be the case called for in Darfur, they would be wise to kill those who would kill the plumbers and electricians in my opinion.

       And that is all I have time to say today.                

Iraq Reaction Plan

      Prior to the war in Iraq when I was writing for Popwars.com I remember saying that even a broken clock is right twice a day, and that maybe Saddam Hussain did have some Weapons of Mass Destruction, but that in the end, going to war without international support would turn out badly.

      So far as far as the United States is concerned, that prediction would seem to hold up as well as any made.

      Prior to the War in Iraq I attempted to have formed an effective United Nations Television Channel actually in fact, as part of a strategy to prevent the looming war.

     Currently I am working towards Directing an Art Show Event to benefit the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, and Hans Blix, along with the Department of Disarmament Affairs of the UN, at the UN.

      Since the issue of Weapons of Mass Destruction was the issue justifying Congressional approval of the War in Iraq, and even if the war had been avoided, how the threat of assaults on working people with Weapons of Mass Destruction is resolved determines whether or not we will experience the use of weapons like the Nuclear Bomb, or the Chemical and Biological sort.

     This is why I am currently working to support the work of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.

      I recognize that now that the war, or near apocalyptic riot is on, Weapons of Mass Destruction need to be hunted down and destroyed or disarmed.

      For that to be accomplished the International Community must agree the creation of an armed force willing and able to brook no resistance to the elimination of these weapons, by anybody.

      The failure of Statesmen and Spies to work together results in "War".

      Spies and Mobsters know that really war is a constant thing.   Their jobs are deadly and it is mostly anonymous.

       The rest of us need to accept that war is a constant, and then accept that regardless of our hopes, a realistic responsible reaction to that understanding is to require enforcement of the rules.

      So many more people around the world love soccer more than they love baseball, that I am forced to use the analogy of soccer, and the international acceptance of the rules there, as an argument for hope of agreements about rules of war.

     I agree with Hans Blix that there has not been a time since the time of Eisenhour that there was any hope of getting rid of Nuclear Weapons, and in fact I also accept that during the time of the Cold War, they did their jobs.

     During the Cold War, nuclear weapons actually helped keep the peace.

     Now they have lost their utility.

     Times have changed.

     Every Labor Union or other organization or even government that claims to represent the interests of working people needs to support general worldwide removal of Weapons of Mass Destruction from the "game" of war.

     Soldiers are working people, and in fact it is an honorable profession.   One may fight on the wrong side, which is fighting for the wrong ideals, and still have honor in the way one has fought.

     There are nations in the world who have armies that do not have Weapons of Mass Destruction who love their nation just as much as soldiers of nations that have Nuclear Weapons and the like.

      I’d pay their best to search out and destroy Weapons of Mass Destruction with Transcendian funds, if I had any.

      I’d endorse funding from my US taxes to the UN if it had an armed force that was forever fighting to keep Weapons of Mass Destruction out of my life.

      I think even Quakers would find something to do in the fight to rid mankind of the threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

      So there I am on the issue of Weapons of Mass Destruction which requires an international reaction independent of the policies and changing administrations of the US, or any other nation or organization.

      Just as in the US we need a responsible and bi-partisan government, internationally we need a responsible entity, such as the UN might become.

      Now it may well be that the humanitarian UN is the only UN that needs to exist and it is NATO, and Interpol, that can only and do the work that needs to be done as far as the general issue of war.

      The lack of a standing army, and the lack of a constabulary force by the UN has produced the current apocalyptic riot situation.

      "Peace means Police." is what I say, and when armies meet and fight and an army is destroyed or surrenders, the job of armies is done.

       Soldiers are not policemen.

       (The only exception I know of is in Costa Rica, and this recommends their experienced professionals to those charged with dual duties.)

       We all think too much of personalities.   People who act on bad ideas may well be very likable.

       Unlikeable people may well be acting according to perfect ideals, so we are all charged with following by our own lights.

      I myself have had to work so much with difficult people with whom I have agreements that I am sometimes seduced by pleasant personalities who I know are wrong.

      I myself was pleasant and wrong about a detail of a job putting some wood on under a window on the roof, and now I have to fight to correct my mistake before it is executed.

      I once heard that Art can be Perfect, only because each work is finite and fits in a frame.

      By testing my ideas and beliefs as to whether or not they are good or bad beliefs or ideas anymore, I ask myself if the idea hurts or advances my "Class", and my "Class" is working class.

      This war between "Holy Rome" and Islam has been going on for a long time and I am certain that it harms the interests of my class regardless of whether the theologies are perfect or compatible.

      Far as I can tell I have more in common with working people, than I have with any other group, and that on this ground ideals and laws and fights are rightly set.

      I need your support if you are of my class, and believe that my ideas are framed to our shared interests transcendant of religion or nation.

                                                                         Russell Day

Truce Benefits Working Class

      How do we measure the benefits of a truce in the Middle East?   My measure for whether or not a truce is good or bad rests with my brothers and sisters of the working class.   War interfers with honest work which for people like myself is the major source of our hopes and security.

       By focusing my measure of worth for the idea of a truce on who benefits immediately from a truce on those everywhere who I have the most in common with regardless of religion or national origin.

       If I was to make television commercials in an attempt to advance peace I would show to the world people like myself who are prevented from doing their job.   National governments that do not protect their workers from unnecessary war and its interference with their jobs.

      A truce would immediately benefit the working people so then it is not to be inhibited regardless of the potential for Hezzbolaah rearmament.

      That issue can be dealt with within the truce agreement.

      Now let us imagine what would be ideal in such cases by recognizing past present and future such cases.   In the past errant armies, cialis people like Attlia the Hun terrorized common citizens.   Prior to Attlia Roman Armies keep the barbarians at bay, which was a benefit to the workers.   I suppose the infrastructure workers like road builders and bridge builders most benefited from such protection.

       I know that if I were directing what I characterize as the Big Dog strategy for peace, and using the required "Force", I would direct such "Armed Forces" to protect from all warring parties the infrastructure workers, and their workplaces first.

      In the case of Lebanon the immediate repair of the airport in Beruit is demanded as a vital part of the Lebanon infrastructure.

      This would enable revival of the economy, which is apparently much tourist based, as well as facilitating rapid insertion of EU, or UN "Armed Forces".   Now I am calling what might be often called a "Peace Keeping Force" but in order to actually keep the peace this force must be capable and willing to protect its charges with force capable of subduing not one side or the other, but both sides engaged in hostilities harmful to the well being of the working classes.

      I recognize that such a strategy represents a great difficulty to the powers that be, exemplified by Institutions such as the United Nations.   Still it is consistent with the mission of the United Nations which is to prevent war on the one hand, and on the other to at least enforce wherever possible "the rules of war".

      The UN is not commonly understood.   Many people imagine it as somehow Federal, and think of Kofi Annan as having as much power as the President of the United States.

       The Secretary General has little actual power, though the time is coming when what is imagined as being commonly as a misconception, is called to be the actual case.

       The actual change in the nature of what is known as The Power Balance is what needs to drive the adaptation of the United Nations.

      In Fact the United Nations worked well enough during the Cold War Era, which was a period of a Bi Polar Power Balance.

      This is an Era of the Multi Polar Power Balance and requires alterations and especially where armed force is required.

      The United Nations clearly needs an army of its own.   It is slow, cumbersome and inefficient to over and over have to beg nations to assemble and contribute their Armed Forces in cases of clear crisis.

      It is not as if situations have not occurred in the past, and will not occur in the future.   The reality is better faced, accepted, and by rule made acceptable to all nations for the benefit of those who deserve the protection of an International Force.

     One may feel great sadness when contemplating allowing the use of force against an ally such as Irael is to the US, for what is an actual need is for Peace Keeping Forces that do not take sides and are willing to kill warring parties of either side based soley upon the interferance war is to honest working people.

      Now if warring parties actually limit their war to "battlefields" and are having their war according to International Rules of War, the United Nations Armed Forces may well be directed to do nothing.

      This would not be perfect of course, but may well be the most perfect possible reality.

      It must be recognized that it is not wholly dishonorable as a profession, to be a professional soldier or warrior.

     Still in the case of the United Nations and "Armed Forces", armed forces come in two distinct forms, domestic, and defensive and offensive.

      The Domestic armed forces are Police Forces in general.

      The two institutions needed to advance the security internationally of the Working Classes and needed by the United Nations for consistent and constant presence are an army of its own, and a Constabulary chargable with internal domestic peace replacing failing or corrupt police forces such as exist in Iraq now.

     During the Cold War, and the Era of the Bi Polar Power Balance there were spheres of influence that each side maintained that they were charged and allowed to control as far as what violence and wars were allowed.

      Until the time we are in is commonly understood as distinctly different from the preceeding era, institutional modifications to the UN, will not be possible to achieve.

Judging Systems for Working Class Corner

     Guess what!   Democracy is not always the best form of goverment just because it is called so.   This explains why I am a Godwin Anarchist.

       It actually angers me when what is Chaos, is called anarchy.   In fact a good number of "Conservative" precepts and true "Anarchist" precepts are shared exactly.

       The reality as far as what works, and what doesn’t work as a system of government in the end is better named "good manners", which cannot be legislated.

        Years ago when I first started my serious study of government and politics I wrote a little poem:   A good king,/Is a good thing./Tried and true,/And nothing new.

     In a true anarchy it is even alright to have someone in the nation called King from time to time, as long it is a visionary sort of king, and not the sort that comes from inheritance or murder.

     The reality of life for mankind is that though it is preferable to be individually responsible and equipped for all assaults either natural or unnatural, this is not ever anything but an illusion allowed by grace luck and work in a combination that is not fairly doled out, and never will be.

      Well, maybe we can fix that for the robots…

      I don’t want to be so pessimistic.

      At anyrate Democracy as a word, and name to describe the US government, and the harping on it as the one and only form to be encouraged, when in fact the US is more now an Oligarchy, drives me crazy as a word I am supposed to accept as some truth said to me by enemies to hold onto my heart when it is they who have betrayed the ideals and spirit, not to mention the laws of the nation I of course first loved.

      Frankly for me a bit of evidence for this sort of statement that if you Google John Bolton’s address, you don’t really find one, though I guess you could just send it care of the UN in mail that has to be XRayed.

      (Whenever I write people who don’t open mail, I send postcards.)

      They never answer anymore…

      The modern and classical requirement of governments is that they protect their people and borders, and educate their citizens so that they can take care of themselves first, and then others.

       I posit that the name or adjective used to describe a government is not always the one given in the mass media.   The US in its history has had States that were theocracies.   This is one of its powers for it is often enough that the US can say,  "My past, is your future."   – that it is not without honor and pride, despite its currently consistent history of failed morality and wasted courage.

      The nations now that keep war in the Middle East and Africa, going, as nations and cultures, do not protect the rights of women in general, and as far as I am concerned this makes their culture and civilization at odds with mine.

      There is a set of values I am ended with fighting for, as I am called, or able.

      Being a man though I do know how it might turn out like the warning,  "Give ’em and inch, and they’ll take a mile."

       My divorce with a daughter has been all the "Civil War" I need.

       My points in the end are all intended to be practical, idealistic, and fair at the same time.

       Forgive me if I will not give up my sense of humor, and am compeled to reveal it to you.   What truth would you believe really came out of my mouth if I did not try now and then to make you see the joke?

       In the end, we are all working class, whether we like it or not.

       Thieves and murders and criminals of all sorts seem to really want a job once they get in prison.

       Being a soldier is not the same to me as being a warrior.

       I feel that soldiers fight out of fear, and warriors fight for love.

       The greatest sort of armed forces I desire for my invented nation of Transcendia would be voluntary mercenaries.

        I figured out once that if I hired a core to invade Mexican Coke Airports and take them over for hashish and pot peasants, it would at least make a good movie.

      In the past I am on record as saying that hashish is as good or better a high than coke, but much less harmful, and in my experience of some value similar to deep breathing excersises.

       The place of hashish in the cultures of Iran and Iraq and the rest of the areas I don’t really understand except for that shared high intrigues me as a personal advantage if I was to attempt negotiations with them for peace and prosperity across religious tenets, and focused on the value of work to the people they love.

      I don’t think it is out of the question that even theocracies will eventually accept that protecting their working class requires both brains and balls.

      To be equal I ought to say both brains and a vagina, but in my mind it turns out to be that for me the equal statement would be brains and a clit since this is the sort of thing that ought not be taken from any human being, the capacity for pleasure on all three levels is distinct and part of humanity, though I have to admit I am glad I was circumsized, I just don’t think it is the same thing.

       So there you have it.

       My nation, either born to or invented, at its base, has a problem with nations that do not accept and protect womens rights the same as men, when men have the acknowledged rights that are known to be fair according to ethics.

      In the commons the theocracy is suspect in US history when we consider the Witch Hunts of Salem Massachetts.   The international corrilaries cannot be ignored.

       If I was to make a television show to be seen in the Middle East, a show about the Salem Witch Hunts would be one in a series for certain of worth.

      My Past Is Your Future…

      Mr. Diamond does make a wonderful case for Political Science as finished.

      – At least I think so by thinking that enough of the equavalent of experiments have happened, as well as have been documented that we can know the essentially valuable laws of Political Science.

       God knows we need to know them!

       And it is true that we actually do, starting with no matter the system of government in the world, there ought not be any corner of the world where women do not have the rights described by the Declaration of Human Rights, of the United Nations.

        What is fair is fair.

        We do need to remember that Rome fell as it devolved into a dictatorship.

        Theocracy is a challenge for all competing forms or systems of government because we all want to believe in the unseen that will answer our prayers, which we want to be sure to be delivered and heard.

        We want God to talk to us.

        It is good enough, really, that we invented languages for him to use.

        As far as the Oligarchy, I suppose the nation ought to take money from them at a higher tax level if they have not started, or funded a concern that makes good paying work for their fellow citizens.

        Good is the man who invests in the dreams and visions of others who have enabled the fullfilment of his own dreams and acknowledged the rightfulness of his destiny.

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Art Show Proposal Report

      It has been at least 6 months since I began my Atom Bomb Series of paintings and drawings.   I started with Bikini Bomb, and have made works under titles such as My Bomb and Your Bomb Sitting by the Fire, Dad Said The Atom Bomb Made Me, When TVs Were Made of Wood, My Bomb Loves Your Bomb, Channel Wars, and Drift.   In the series I intend another titled More Bombs to Come, but so far that painting has failed.

       After hearing Hans Blix talk about the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, and reading Paul Johnsons’ – A New History of Art, I determined that it was a good time for an art show event at the UN in support of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission and its goals.

        Obviously this sort of show is called to be a group show, though I would like to direct it under the Transcendian name and flag.

       What I envision as a total show is one in which at the opening a work of art was generated, and little model message rockets are launched as we did around Manhattan and in other places during the first Gulf War.

       Conceptually the point of this is to illustrate how a thing may be good and bad at the same time depending on how it is used, and for what purpose.

       In Transcendian Theory this is an example of the Pro-Active Civil Demonstration.

       Now some of my Bomb Series paintings are done on steel, and I am fond of painting on steel, and do so partly for this series mindful of the extinction facing us if these powers we have gained are not brought under control.

       At the opening reception, which is intended to be an important social event I want to mount horizontally on the wall a 3/6s 4’by8′ or longer sheet of steel to be etched, scratched, painted drawn and otherwise attacked by artists and guests creating an image, work of art, to be sold for the benefit of the work of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.

      So then the concept is to have a Group Show thematically about Weapons of Mass Destruction during which time little paper message rockets are launched, and a work on steel is created.

       Why have such a show now, and why should it be at the UN?

       What is the difference between my putting on a show here in Carrboro, North Carolina, and at the UN?

        The Show here will not hurt, but it will not do all that it is intended to do if is only here, and must be installed at the UN to have the effect, in the time allowed by the grace of God, or whatever serves that position.

       It is without doubt that collectively we are threatened beyond acceptable limits.

      It simply is unacceptable for mankind to tolerate weapons that turn war into apocalyptic riot.

      The change in the times from an era of Bi Polar Power Balance to an era of Multi Polar Power Balance in the geo politics of our current world now call for the elimanation of weapons too much a temptation to use for nations, or the equivalent of barbarians when we consider Hezbollah and the like.

      Now the UN must change its thinking from wiping out all wars, to at least enforcing the rules of war.

      Art does play a role in affecting thinking, and ideas, and the way things are done, and what beliefs are most commonly held in the minds of mankind.

     These works of art about Weapons of Mass Destruction, in a Show, at the UN, as part of a strategy, are intended to open minds to the real possiblity of elimanating these weapons that violate inherently a more proper conduct of armed conflicts.

      These things have been done in the past by nations, and in this respect we ought to accept the wisdom of more civilized times demonstrated as possible by a history which does give mankind some reasons for pride.

     One instance I know of where a weapon was put down and elimanated for two centuries was the instance where the Japanese gave up firearms.

     So the purpose of the show at its moment, and in its time is to open minds to the possiblity of getting rid of these weapons, which infact have lost their utility which was for a unique era of a power balance for which they did their job, but when that distinct era, no longer exists, and therefore insures eventual horror if these weapons are not gotten out of arsenals public or private.

     Art is something mankind can be more proud of than war.

     Now for a complete strategy when fighting for a actionable idea one must campaign on the radio, on the tv, in the movies, and in the papers.

      Then this show ought to be covered by each medium with as international distribution as possible.

      It truly is unfortunate that the UN does not have presence in more commonly available television so that more understanding of shared issues was advanced.

      However regardless of that failure, a complete strategy is the same, though coverage and distribution more complicated.

      This art show I propose and am seeking support for cannot but be a part of an overall and ongoing strategy if success is to be achieved.

      So far my progress has been to discover that at the UN Transcendia needs support from a Government such as Sweden.   I have reason to believe that due to the nature of the canon of my own art, which I have discovered to be more Chinese than I had known before I read Paul Johnsons’ excellent book of art history, and therefore think they might want to at least buy some of my art, and at best support the show.

      It is good that they foreswear first use of Nuclear weapons, whereas the US does not.

       Also I have discovered that the Department of Disarmament Affairs of the United Nations need support and may well be important as party to the show.

       It would be sensible and correct to solicit the support of all organizations public and private with the same goals so as to bring them together and amplify their power for those shared and specific goals.

      My correspondence on this issue has been with two members of the Department of Disarmament, one of whom was formerly on the Secretariat of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.

      I have not heard from the Secretariat Mr. Salander in Sweden, or Hans Blix, though I have today put an international call into those offices as prompt to the emails sent over this period.

      The Gallery Pace MacGill in Manhattan is considering involvement in the show in one capacity or another.   I recognize I need help in the City, and have reached out to them because they are to show some work by David Byrne who I want individual support and involvement from, which recommends Pace MacGill.

      Otherwise I am working at putting the show together here locally where I live since I am more able to do that face to face, for it is always recommended that one do what one can regardless of what may be ideal.

      I hope I can get my painting, More Bombs to Come, properly done, to add to the show.

                                                                    Best- Russell Day

My Guts Got Wrapped Shut by their Covering

      –And I had to go to the doctor and the hospital and be cut open and the stuff that wrapped up my guts cut out of the way, stomach and then sewn back together.

       During my stay in the hospital I was not able to do much about world affairs, or even local affairs.

        When I was finally able to get out of the hospital a great number of rockets were being fired by either North Korea, or Hezzbolla, or Israel, I guess.

        As the Morphine wore off I visualized a ball of Portland Cement in a ball with rockets sticking out of it.

       I started to work on the Weapons of Mass Destruction Art Show Event.

       I looked at my rocket kit.

       Apparently people like rockets quite a bit.   I and my comrades have had some great times launching rockets, and again I encourage you to launch a rocket as an experience that is apparently very powerful.

       If Estes Rocket Company had any sense they would give away their rockets to everyone in Beruit and Jerusalem.

       It really is a good thing to do, launching rockets, if you do it by the rules.

       It is wonderful to get a call from someone who finds your message rocket and asks you if you want it back.

       Then you may have dinner, or a popscicle together.

       Otherwise if you want to encourage peace in the Middle East, think in terms of a good menu.

      Think in terms of the real food and the mental equivalent of food and put that all on the table, when you take Atomic bombs and the like out of the arsenals of public or private organizations.

                                                                 Later, Russell

The Things in Some Order, ailment

of how the Working Class can Save the World, vialis 40mg maybe.

by Russell Scott Day

Neccessary for longer human survival, prescription and short term Peace, If nothing Else.

by Russell Scott Day

        Food is the number one ingredient for peace, and that means that if you want peace either in your immediate neighborhood, or somewhere far away, you or your group, tribe, nation or organization are wise to give food to people and nations you want to be friends with, or want to resolve a conflict with.

       In the case of North Korea I must reverse myself and say that now I accept that food may be used as a weapon.

       In the case of North Korea, whose rocket may not fly particularly well, if it is launched, and if I was charged to defend my people, I would be very inclined to blow their rocket off its pad as soon as I knew it might be launched.

       It would not particularly matter to me if it was armed.

       I have had some rocket launch failures.

       Launching rockets is fun.

       I encourage people to launch rockets for Transcendia with messages on them that encourage peace.

       So then I think it is okay if North Korea gets to launch rockets, but know that the rocket needs to be inspected and properly aimed.

       The rockets I launched all over Manhattan were made of cardboard and balsa wood, but I did have two failures.   One of the message rockets blew up on the pad with NYPD witnesses, and the other went out of control in Prospect Park.

      The top speed for my Message Rockets was only about 450 miles an hour.

       South Korea has indicated that they might not give North Korea food if North Korea launches the interesting rocket they have set up for launch.

        As I have said, launching rockets is fun, and a worthy thing to do, and I encourage Transcendians to launch Message Rockets.

        Now the smartest thing I can think to do as concerns North Korea, South Korea, Japan, China, Russia and the United States is to applaud North Korea for making a rocket, which is a fun thing to do, and get them to accept some inspectors and advice about how to fly it so that it has a good and fun flight which we can watch, and how doing that will get them the food they need.

         I actually own a Kia which is a car made in South Korea.

         Therefore I have a unique understanding of some of the technological issues involved.

        The South Korean car I have is reputed to be the worst car ever made.

         Now this does not reccommend the North Korean Rocket.

         Of course the reality is that unless the Russians and the United Statesians had merged their space programs more Cosmonauts and Astronauts would have died than have so far.

         One of my Pilot heros told me that Korean women were the most generally beautiful.

         So then I would suggest that a North Korean Woman be put into the Space Station Program that the Russians and the USians control if the North Koreans let us Working Classes control their rocket launch.

       As an immediate action I suggest throwing food at North Korea to get them to the table of negotiation.

       I admit that this is a weird skew of sanity that I am assaulting you with.

        I could go on explaining it but it is time for dinner.

                                                                        Russell

Menu for Peace

     There are things that are ingredients of peace and basically they are food and mannered rituals of feeding.

       Conflicts about interest charges between the culture of Islam and Judisim are more significant than commonly addressed.

       As I say and will say and have said, cheap it would be better to have a menu for peace in the Middle East than a Road Map, medicine since no one is really going anywhere.

      As a fine reality tv show I would direct the perfect meal.

      A fine meal for enemies and friends since the elite need to eat with the working classes for chaos to end.

       This is all I am going to write on this right now.

       My other work now is to put a good art show happening in the UN Lobby about Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their obsolesence, as things have turned out.

       I did declare war on Weapons of Mass Destruction about 4 months ago, but no one noticed.

      A good Art Show at the UN would hopefully get my declaration of war on Weapons of Mass Destruction Financed.

                                                                Russell